Orange and blue QIDI-590 RC airplane with propeller and landing gear on a white background, for the QIDI-590 and MoFly MF-X7 buying guide.

QIDI-590 vs MoFly MF-X7: Key Differences to Help You Choose the Right Aircraft

Choose the QIDI-590 for the lower one-battery package price; shortlist the MoFly MF-X7 if the supplied transmitter matters more to you. The current price gap is A$20. Mitch Cooper RC preferred the MF-X7 mainly for its radio, while Andrej Sturm separately described the QIDI version’s motor as weaker than the MoFly version’s.[1] [2] [3] [5]

Both are sold as 4-channel brushless RC planes. Here are the differences that matter when choosing a package, a control layout and the flight modes you want to use.[1] [2]

Orange and blue QIDI-590 RC airplane with three-blade propeller and landing gear, shown from above at an angle.
QIDI-590 product image from the KTL listing.[1]
Red and silver MF-X7 Phoenix RC airplane with decorative wing graphics, propeller and landing gear, shown at an angle.
MF-X7 Phoenix product image from the KTL listing.[2]

Quick comparison at a glance

KTL’s AUD listings rechecked 18 October 2026. Technical figures are published specifications; prices compare one-battery packages.[1] [2]
Feature QIDI-590 MoFly MF-X7
Wingspan / length 500 / 370 mm 510 / 365 mm
Motor / ESC 1504 brushless / 10A 1504-4700KV brushless / 12A[12]
Included flight battery 3.7 V 500 mAh LiPo 3.7 V 800 mAh LiPo
Published flight-time estimate Approximately 10–12 minutes KTL: approximately 18 minutes; manufacturer: approximately 16 minutes[11] [12]
Documented mode labels 6G beginner / 3G gyro-assisted / inverted[10] 6G / 3D / MM manual[9] [11]
One-battery package A$179.95 — QIDI-590 A$199.95 — MF-X7

Flight-time estimates use different or unstated conditions. The reviews below were separate sessions, so they provide buying context rather than a controlled head-to-head result.

1. Transmitter feel and Mode 1 / Mode 2

Mitch’s comparison gives the MF-X7 a slight preference mainly because of its transmitter. His MF-X7 review shows its high/low-rate control, trims and flight-mode selector—useful details to inspect before choosing.[3] [4]

His QIDI sample’s radio beeped unexpectedly and later stopped working. He thought the problem could be specific to his unit; it is a sample report, with no evidence of a model-wide failure rate.[6]

Prefer right-hand throttle? The MF-X7 manual illustrates Mode 1 with right-stick throttle and Mode 2 with left-stick throttle. KTL’s current MF-X7 FAQ says a Mode 1 radio can be supplied if you leave “Mode 1” in the checkout order note. Request the layout when ordering; the two diagrams do not establish a user conversion procedure.[2] [9]

2. Power: read the flight feedback alongside the specifications

The 10A and 12A ESC ratings belong in the specification comparison, but they do not establish a measured thrust or climb-rate advantage. Andrej’s observation that the QIDI motor felt weaker supports considering the MF-X7 when power is a priority. Mitch also wanted more power from his QIDI sample in a windy park flight.[1] [2] [5] [7] [12]

The available evidence does not quantify the difference or show that the QIDI draws less energy. Avoid choosing either model on a promised speed, wind capability or efficiency advantage.

3. Flight modes: gyro assistance and manual labels

QIDI-590: the product graphic identifies beginner 6G, gyro-assisted 3G and an inverted setting. Its 3G label should not be read as proof that all stabilization is switched off.[10]

MF-X7: the manufacturer describes 6G as 6-axis gyro, 3D as 3-axis gyro and MM as manual. Its manual also labels these three choices. If progressing toward manual flying is a priority, this documented MM option is a reason to investigate the MF-X7; match the supplied radio and instructions before using it.[9] [11]

Mode 1 / Mode 2 describes the stick layout. It is a separate choice from the 6G / 3D / MM flight setting.

4. Battery capacity, flight time and package value

The QIDI-590 saves A$20 on the one-battery package, while the MF-X7 includes an 800 mAh pack instead of 500 mAh. Both listings include the radio and a USB charging accessory; select the exact battery-count variant before comparing the total package.[1] [2] [8]

For endurance, treat the minutes in the table as estimates. The MF-X7’s own sources differ—about 18 minutes on KTL’s listing and about 16 minutes on the manufacturer sheet—and neither establishes a matched test against the QIDI. They do not guarantee your flight time.[1] [2] [11] [12]

Buying spare batteries? KTL advertises larger-capacity 1S support for the QIDI-590, but this does not mean any 1S pack fits. Confirm the exact replacement’s connector, polarity, dimensions, mass and balance requirements, and charger compatibility before ordering. The MF-X7 parts and accessories collection provides a model-specific starting point for MF-X7 owners.[1] [2]

Which RC plane should you choose?

  • Consider the QIDI-590 if price is your main priority: its listed one-battery package costs A$179.95. The smaller included pack is part of that comparison.[1] [2]
  • Shortlist the MF-X7 if you value the reviewer-preferred radio: inspect the controls in Mitch’s video and request Mode 1 at checkout if that is your preferred layout.[2] [3] [4]
  • Investigate the MF-X7 if manual progression or power matters most: it has a documented MM setting and the favourable qualitative motor comparison. Neither is a quantified performance guarantee.[5] [9] [11]

If this will be your first aircraft, start with our beginner RC plane buying guide. For a package or parts question, contact KTL with the exact model, preferred stick layout and selected battery bundle before ordering.

Watch the original Mitch Cooper RC reviews

The MF-X7 video starts at the transmitter discussion. The QIDI-590 review includes the sample-radio issue; the reference links also open the relevant comments and timestamps.

References

  1. KTL QIDI-590 product listing. Current description and one-battery variant checked 18 October 2026. Listed specifications and package price.
  2. KTL MoFly MF-X7 product listing. Current description, one-battery variant and parts link checked 18 October 2026.
  3. Mitch Cooper RC: QIDI-590 comparison discussion. Video published 26 August 2026; the uploader’s reply gives his preference. Video date is not the reply date.
  4. Mitch Cooper RC: MF-X7 transmitter discussion, 04:56–06:12. Video published 1 July 2026.
  5. Andrej Sturm: QIDI-590 motor comparison reply. Video published 11 October 2026; qualitative observation in the uploader’s reply.
  6. Mitch’s QIDI transmitter issue, 05:26–06:03; earlier sample context; later transmitter-status reply.
  7. Mitch’s QIDI review: 1S 500 mAh, 03:13; power observation, 11:00. Windy park review, rather than a laboratory test.
  8. Mitch’s MF-X7 review: 1S 800 mAh, 10:58. A separate flying session.
  9. MO-FLY MF-X7 original manual, Part 1, PDF p.8 (printed p.7); Part 2, PDF p.1 (printed p.8). Original manufacturer-filed documents mirrored by FCCID.io; transmitter diagrams and layouts. Current stock revision was not independently confirmed.
  10. QIDI-590 supplier product graphic hosted on KTL. Transmitter-control panel, checked 16 October 2026. This is a product graphic, rather than a verified current QIDI-590 instruction manual.
  11. MO-FLY MF-X7 manufacturer overview. Defines MM as manual, 3D as 3-axis gyro and 6G as 6-axis gyro. Also describes over 16 minutes of gliding flight; it does not establish a matching KTL stock revision.
  12. MO-FLY MF-X7 manufacturer specification sheet. Lists 1504 4700KV motor, 12A ESC, 3.7 V 800 mAh pack and approximately 16 minutes. The current KTL listing instead estimates approximately 18 minutes.
Torna al blog

Lascia un commento

Si prega di notare che, prima di essere pubblicati, i commenti devono essere approvati.